Pres. B+, Obiama clearliar Chicagous

This video shows eight straight "I will do this...you will see this....we will be seen....this will be there for all to see....you will see this clearly....as I said before, we will be clearly seen....everything will be here to see..."

Therefore we ask, if the truth of anything Pres. B+ says depends on the number of times he says it, what is that number? We know it is greater than eight. His most favorite word..."I".

I suggest that whenever one sees or hears Mr. B+ say the word "I", it be heard or seen as if watching a Chinese martial arts movie. The subtitles read "I". In the literal translation, the phrase is, "I am a liar."

If Pres. B+ tells the truth in a forest, and no one is there to no report it, or deny he did, or did not say it, is he still lying?

Gitmo Prisoners in Illinois

A short argument for moving the terrorists to Illinois.

They will be easier to shoot off the top of the walls.

Screwed up Boneheadedness

The failure to snatch the crotch bomber before combustion is a "screw up" says Pres. B+

His buying a sliver of land, his own Gadsen purchase from Sir Rezco a "Boneheaded mistake".

What will he call if someone dies?

And who will be try to blame then?

We are on our own until 2010. Hopefully enough Dhims can be swept from the field to outflank Pres. B+.

We must pray the country is not overtaken by events.

Pres. Alien Insect Overlord...and VP B+

(thinking) "mmm...the only guy whose brain we don't have to eat."

Downing Street Back at Ya!

Return the bust of Churchill to the British, give the PM a set of movies he cannot play and in return, receive this lovely parting gift:

MI5 told US about Detroit bomber's terror links 'a year ago'

Britain told American intelligence agents more than a year ago that the Detroit bomber had links to extremists, according to Downing Street.

As with all and any newspaper articles, to spot and avoid the speculative "this could have" and the " some say, but others disagree" we're reporters, and have two wrong opinions in our story 'fairness disclaimer and the passive voice wet manure landmines "last week it was found that"...read the article from bottom to top.

Words' Evasions

Pres. B+ quoted his inaugural address. "On that day," he said, "I made it very clear our nation is at war against a far-reaching network of violence and hatred, and that we will do whatever it takes to defeat them. . . . And make no mistake, that's exactly what we've been doing."

This is just more adulterated bullshit from the B+ in chief who, it seems to me, believes words are actions. And subsequently he uses them as proxies for real actions. "We have previously addressed our position on flatted tires, and it's time for the partisan Pirelli attacks to cease." Gag me.

Others, (Powerline et. al.) have noted the B+ in chief took four days to reply to the Christmas attack, but only four hours to whine at Dick Cheney's calling him out. These evasions are very very lethal to liberty. The man cannot speak plainly and it is obvious he simply does not have it in himself to do so. In this respect I am reminded of someone I know who believes that all the miracles of the Lord Jesus Christ, and of all the Communion of Saints are pathologies. He has built for himself a very convenient reason to dismiss all things supernatural. Mr. B+ has built the same with words, excusing him from the need to have, and act, with true courage. The occasional spit suffices.

Unfairly B plussed

We read, via Redstate.org, at Newsweek.com, regarding the death of CIA agents in Afghanistan this, " Presidential aides are concerned that Obama will somehow be unfairly accused of dropping the ball on the fight against terrorist in Yemen"

Is this 'concern' at the top of the list?

Or is it the only item on the list?

We think the latter.